On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:36 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Looking through the emails it seems that there is an issue with alias
> strings. 

To be more precise, there seems no big issue currently. I just wanted to
make following usage of kmem_cache_create (SLUB) possible:

        name = some string kmalloced
        kmem_cache_create(name, ...)
        kfree(name);

And from my understanding of the code, the saved_alias list, which is
used to keep track of the alias entries during early boot (slab_state <
SYSFS), is a blocker. It needs the name string to be valid until
slab_sysfs_init() is finished. 

> That can be solved by duping the name of the slab earlier in 
> kmem_cache_create().
> Does this patch fix the issue?

I'm afraid not...

With the patch below, we still need to kfree the duplicated name in
slab_sysfs_init().

And I think it would be easier to understand if we duplicate the name
string when creating one entry for saved_alias list, and kfree it when
we remove one entry from saved_alias list. 

I'm not sure whether you got the patch #1 of the two I sent previously.
If not, would you kindly spend some time reviewing it to see if I missed
anything? Link below for your convenience:
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/27/83

Btw, as Ben suggested, I'm now working on duplicating the name string in
SLAB to make them consistent, so we don't need the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
any more. Will send it out for your review after it is finished.

> Subject: slub: Dup name earlier in kmem_cache_create
> 
> Dup the name earlier in kmem_cache_create so that alias
> processing is done using the copy of the string and not
> the string itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
> 
> ---
>  mm/slub.c |   29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c  2012-06-11 08:49:56.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c       2012-07-03 15:17:37.000000000 -0500
> @@ -3933,8 +3933,12 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
>       if (WARN_ON(!name))
>               return NULL;
> 
> +     n = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!n)
> +             goto out;
> +
>       down_write(&slub_lock);
> -     s = find_mergeable(size, align, flags, name, ctor);
> +     s = find_mergeable(size, align, flags, n, ctor);
>       if (s) {
>               s->refcount++;
>               /*
> @@ -3944,7 +3948,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
>               s->objsize = max(s->objsize, (int)size);
>               s->inuse = max_t(int, s->inuse, ALIGN(size, sizeof(void *)));
> 
> -             if (sysfs_slab_alias(s, name)) {
> +             if (sysfs_slab_alias(s, n)) {
>                       s->refcount--;
>                       goto err;
>               }
> @@ -3952,31 +3956,26 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
>               return s;
>       }
> 
> -     n = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!n)
> -             goto err;
> -
>       s = kmalloc(kmem_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (s) {
>               if (kmem_cache_open(s, n,
>                               size, align, flags, ctor)) {
>                       list_add(&s->list, &slab_caches);
>                       up_write(&slub_lock);
> -                     if (sysfs_slab_add(s)) {
> -                             down_write(&slub_lock);
> -                             list_del(&s->list);
> -                             kfree(n);
> -                             kfree(s);
> -                             goto err;
> -                     }
> -                     return s;
> +                     if (!sysfs_slab_add(s))
> +                             return s;
> +
> +                     down_write(&slub_lock);
> +                     list_del(&s->list);
>               }
>               kfree(s);
>       }
> -     kfree(n);
> +
>  err:
> +     kfree(n);
>       up_write(&slub_lock);
> 
> +out:
>       if (flags & SLAB_PANIC)
>               panic("Cannot create slabcache %s\n", name);
>       else
> 


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to