On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, > so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id().
Won't it fall through to the next closest memory node in the zonelist anyway? Is this for callers doing NUMA_NO_NODE with __GFP_THISZONE? _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
