On 11/23/15, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > Hi Denis, > > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 17:48 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> As we all know we have a great tool to track the patch queue - patchwork. >> The sad thing is that it's maintained not good as it could be. The >> netdev patchwork is a great example of how it can be done and I bet >> everyone would love to see the ppc patch queue like that. > > What exactly is wrong with it?
I just wanted to point out that we have some patches without any reply like https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/518981/ or patches since 2010. > > I try pretty hard to keep it up to date with the state of what's happening > in > my tree. I'm fairly sure that everything I merged for 4.4 has been marked > accepted. Nothing personal, I see that you made a good progress with it because I remember how it looked like a few years ago. > > There are a lot of new patches there at the moment, but that's mainly > because I > haven't started merging things for 4.5 yet. > >> So can we improve the current situation? I'd love to help in any way >> possible. > > You could send fewer patches ;) I could, but I want make it better :) Thanks! > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
