On 11/11/06, Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kalle Pokki writes:
>
> > Hmm, it seems you already pushed the changes. This should apply to the
> > current 'merge' branch.
>
> That on its own is hard to justify as a bug fix, isn't it?
Sure, but since you removed the last hunk of the patch that became
0091cf5a6ae6e52fc95ceb53200975ef2c81c206, we now have a little
inconsistent definitions:
in cpm_uart.h
int __init cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void);
in cpm_uart_cpm1.c
int __init cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
{
}
in cpm_uart_cpm2.c
int cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
{
}
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
