On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:54:21 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Vitaly Bordug writes:
> 
> > patch with proper description inlined.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Vitaly
> > ---
> > [POWERPC] CPM_UART: Fixes inconsistency of function definition
> > 
> > From: Kalle Pokki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > The below hunk was missed from the recent patch, and now, there are 
> > somewhat 
> > inconsistent definitions:
> 
> Well, what I want to know is this: why was the addition of __init
> bundled in with what I was told was a bug-fix that was needed for
> 2.6.19?  Does the addition of __init fix a bug somehow?
> 
> 
That wasn't for .19 - I assumed your comment as -ENO_PROPER_DESCRIPTION.
The issue is small but shouldn't be put aside.


-- 
Sincerely, 
Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Reply via email to