On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:54:21 +1100 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vitaly Bordug writes: > > > patch with proper description inlined. > > > > Thanks, > > -Vitaly > > --- > > [POWERPC] CPM_UART: Fixes inconsistency of function definition > > > > From: Kalle Pokki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The below hunk was missed from the recent patch, and now, there are > > somewhat > > inconsistent definitions: > > Well, what I want to know is this: why was the addition of __init > bundled in with what I was told was a bug-fix that was needed for > 2.6.19? Does the addition of __init fix a bug somehow? > > That wasn't for .19 - I assumed your comment as -ENO_PROPER_DESCRIPTION. The issue is small but shouldn't be put aside. -- Sincerely, Vitaly _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded