On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:13:30PM -0700, Dean Matsen wrote: > Paul Mackerras wrote: > > >Dean Matsen writes: > > > > > > > >>Somewhere in this discussion thread I saw that the 2.4 kernel is closed > >>for > >>patches (I just joined this list, so I didn't know that). > >> > >> > > > >Well, that's not strictly true, we will continue to fix things that > >are broken, but I would prefer than any new development (e.g. support > >for new boards or devices) happened in 2.5. It's a bit disappointing > >that 8xx still doesn't compile in 2.5. I don't have any 8xx hardware > >to test on so I have been relying on others to update it. > > > > > Ok, in that case I do have ONE thing that I know should be fixed, but > I haven't seen any response on it, so I am wondering if anyone noticed > it at all. See > > http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-dev/200307/msg00085.html
This has been fixed in the 2_4_devel tree now. This is not an issue in 2.5 / 2.6. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
