On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:43:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > in message <20030711151834.GU17433 at ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> you wrote: > > > > > We changed this in our kernel tree some time ago. If no valid PHY is > > > found we simply do not enable the interface, but we do not panic any > > > more. > > > > Which raises two fun questions: > > 1) Do you plan on ever trying to re-sync your 2.4 tree with the > > community tree (which should become kernel.org before too long)? > > We do this from time to time. The last (visible) re-sync was with > 2.4.20 (ChangeSet 1.1174 = 20021129181904|49831), which is half a > year ago. On the other hand, we don't have the resources to follow > each and every change immediately. > > > 2) Do you plan on trying to keep in sync with 2.6 now that it's coming > > up on us? > > Of course we will follow 2.6 as well. > > Why are you asking? Did I give any reason to think we might go out of > business?
No, but I do wonder if you ever plan on sending anything out again. It does seem to be a once a year event, which is just about due (2002-06-18 is the last one I see). -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
