In message <11675-28654 at sneakemail.com> you wrote:
>
> What is the relationship between the linuxppc-2.4 tree from
> bk, and the anonymous cvs linuxppc_2_4_devel hosted by Denx?
Our linuxppc_2_4_devel CVS tree is a (modified, extended) copy of the
BK tree of the same name, which used to be the "official" development
tree but has been declared dead a long time ago.
> The latter *seems* more stable, but I'm hoping to integrate
> in patches for me JSE board after cleaning up patches, and
> it's not clear which tree I should work with.
You should work with the official trees, i. e. linuxppc-2.4 or
linuxppc-2.5.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable
-- Spock, "The Enterprise" Incident", stardate 5027.3
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
