In message <Pine.GSO.4.53.0406111437580.9184 at solaris.xmission.com> you wrote:
>
> Unless I made some mistake in cloning the linuxppc-2.{4,5} trees from
> ppc.bkbits.net, (which is entirely possible as I'm a BK newbie), there
> appears to be a fair amount of processor- and platform-specific stuff
> in the Denx linuxppc_2_4_devel CVS tree which does not appear in the
> ppc.bkbits.net BK trees (e.g. arch/ppc/5xxx_io/... ).
Your finding is correct.
> Is the Denx CVS tree "authoritative" with regard to those extras? Is
No, not at all. It's just what we're doing here at DENX.
> there any expectation that those bits found only in the Denx CVS tree
> will eventually find their way into the ppc.bkbits.net tree(s)? (Or
> some other, more appropriate tree(s)? If so, which?)
I gave up submitting patches - probably my communication skills are
inadequate.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger Dijkstra
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
