In message <20030303234618.GA12721 at ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> you wrote: > > > Sorry, this is one of our patches that never was accepted for the > > official source trees (also including hardware flow control). > > ... because you never split things out into logical chunks which make > life easier on people trying to understand what changed and why. Our > last merge went well I thought, and I'm up for another round if you are.
It would be too much trouble to separate the hardware flow control stuff from the other port configuration options. I feel it should be sufficient to have a set of changes local to one single source file. You say it is not sufficent. OK. You are the maintainer, I ain't. It's your decision, and I won't discuss it. Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de "Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch." - Robert Orben ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
