On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:03:30AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <20030303234618.GA12721 at ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> you wrote: > > > > > Sorry, this is one of our patches that never was accepted for the > > > official source trees (also including hardware flow control). > > > > ... because you never split things out into logical chunks which make > > life easier on people trying to understand what changed and why. Our > > last merge went well I thought, and I'm up for another round if you are. > > It would be too much trouble to separate the hardware flow control > stuff from the other port configuration options. I feel it should be > sufficient to have a set of changes local to one single source file.
If you're referring to the very configurable SCC portion, as far as I know, no one, including yourself has made a verion which satisifes all of the people all of the time, which is why Dan hasn't approved any of the patches to do that. But maybe the 2.5 config language will allow someone to write it in a manner which lets everyone do what they want.. But, it's been a while, so if it's not too much trouble, can you send it out again? > You say it is not sufficent. OK. You are the maintainer, I ain't. Dan Malek is really, I just try and help him when I can. :) -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
