Hi Kumar: > Is this for 2.6? Oh sorry, certainly for 2.6 (Sylvain's kernel more precisely). But since, Sylvain not maintainer of ocp_ids.h, so I send this patch to Paul (who create it, am I right?).
> If so, 5200 needs to be moved to using the new driver > model and platform devices. Take a look at support for MPC85xx or > marvell (mv64x60) as examples. > > - kumar Kumar, please, more cleanly, what did you want to say? If you told about board_ocp[] in lite5200.c (platform specific). Then yes, I use it, but not mpc5200.c -- Andrey > > On Mar 9, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Pls. commit this patch, its needed for MPC5200 Can >> >> Regards >> Andrey Volkov >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Volkov <avolkov at varma-el.com> >> -- >> ChangeSet at 1.2159, 2005-03-09 15:05:37+03:00, avolkov at varma-el.com >> ocp_ids.h: >> New number for onboard CANbus devs. >> >> >> >> ocp_ids.h | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> >> >> diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h >> --- a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00 >> +++ b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00 >> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ >> #define OCP_FUNC_RGMII 0x00D3 >> #define OCP_FUNC_TAH 0x00D4 >> #define OCP_FUNC_SEC2 0x00D5 /* Crypto/Security 2.0 */ >> +#define OCP_FUNC_CAN 0x00D6 /* CAN bus device */ >> >> /* Network 0x0200 - 0x02FF */ >> #define OCP_FUNC_EMAC 0x0200 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list >> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > > >
