Ok, accepted, I'll be delayed until driver will be done. Andrey
Kumar Gala wrote: > I would assume you plan on moving your driver over to the driver model > which will make all of this moot. > > So I think Sylvain's suggestion of allocating a number for the time > being makes the most sense until we get 52xx convert over to platform > devices. > > - kumar > > On Mar 10, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote: > >> Sylvain Munaut wrote: >> > >> >> Sylvain, but what I wish now - only single number >> >> (until driver will done). >> > >> > If you only need a temporary ocp ID, just fix it youself in your local >> > tree, no need to try to push that upstream. >> >> I already use it as temp, but I don't want pitfalls in future (when >> smb. take this number). >> >> Also, since CAN ocp present not only in MPC5200, but, AFAIK, in another >> chips too, IMHO, it must be well known constant id. >> >> Regards >> Andrey > > >
