Ming, Another option for you may be to get MontaVista's latest linuxppc-2.4 kernel tree from source.mvista.com (using rsync), which I believe has the xilinx_gige directory and menuconfig entries.
-Rick -----Original Message----- From: Ming Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:36 PM To: rick.moleres Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org Subject: RE: question about linux with Xilinx ML-403 Dear Rick, OK. I will try that. However I cannot promise to finish this very soon because I am a novice. :) I will let you know if there is any result. Thanks for your method. BR Ming >From: "Rick Moleres" <rick.moleres at xilinx.com> >To: "Ming Liu" <eemingliu at hotmail.com>, "rick.moleres" <rick.moleres at xilinx.com> >CC: <linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org> >Subject: RE: question about linux with Xilinx ML-403 >Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:25:10 -0600 > > > >Ming, > > > > > > >Our best recommendation is to use the drivers/net/xilinx_enet directory > > >for the temac driver and just enable the Xilinx 10/100 Ethernet in > > >menuconfig. > > > >I am not so clear with this. Do you mean that I just copy the source >code > >in the directory of xilinx_gige generated by EDK into the directory of > >xilinx_enet in linux2.4.20, and then enable the Xilinx 10/100 ethernet >in > >the menuconfig? Can this method realize the 1000M ethernet? The source >code > >file names for Temac (xtemac_xxx.c or .h) are different with the ones >for > >emac (xemac_xxx.c or .h). Can the xtemac files be recognized by the >linux > >kernel? > > > >Right - you would need to copy the xtemac* files and the Makefile over, >and would have to change the Makefile to make sure it produces >xilinx_enet.o instead of xilinx_gige.o. We haven't tried this, but we >don't think there's any reason this shouldn't work. Can you let us know >how it goes? > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ ???? MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
