Why should this be taken off list? Is it because it's Denx specific? Or because it's 2.4 specific? There is active 5200 development on the 2.4 kernel at Denx and it seems relevant to this list.
-----Original Message----- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:12 AM To: hs at denx.de Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org; Chad.Rowan at thyssenkrupp.com Subject: Re: export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest linuxppc_2_4_deve l [r eposted]? On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:55 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Chad > >> linuxppc_2_4_devel is alive and well. >> >> http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi? >> p=linuxppc_2_4_devel.git;a=shortlog > > You speak from the DENX linuxppc_2_4_devel Kernel? If so, I think > you are right. > I had the same problem, some days ago. I made a SPI bitbanging > algorithm, but > I dont know, if this goes in the git repository from DENX ... > Wolfgang? I think this issue should be taken off list. - k
