On Jul 20, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Rowan, Chad wrote: > Why should this be taken off list? Is it because it's Denx > specific? Or > because it's 2.4 specific? There is active 5200 development on the > 2.4 > kernel at Denx and it seems relevant to this list.
Because its Denx specific, I believe the tree you are taking about is maintained only by Denx and not a community tree. - k > -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak at kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:12 AM > To: hs at denx.de > Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org; Chad.Rowan at thyssenkrupp.com > Subject: Re: export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest > linuxppc_2_4_deve l > [r eposted]? > > > On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:55 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> Hello Chad >> >>> linuxppc_2_4_devel is alive and well. >>> >>> http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi? >>> p=linuxppc_2_4_devel.git;a=shortlog >> >> You speak from the DENX linuxppc_2_4_devel Kernel? If so, I think >> you are right. >> I had the same problem, some days ago. I made a SPI bitbanging >> algorithm, but >> I dont know, if this goes in the git repository from DENX ... >> Wolfgang? > > I think this issue should be taken off list. > > - k
