> > >>sleep(0) could be defined as: >>-schedule to next task if there is any (just call schedule() ) >>-sleep minimum value (1 jiffie) >> >>default kernel (no timer patches) uses second definition, >> >> > >No, linux uses the first definition(or whatever schedule_timeout(0) does). >If t is zero then expire also becomes zero. > > maybe, my missunderstood
>>there is special call schedule_timeout(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) which also >>calls schedule() >> >> see kernel/sched.c so, anyone knows what linus.t says about adding one jiffie to every non-zero expire? -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * per pedes ad astra! * * * * * * * * * * * * * mailto:krom at dgt-lab.com.pl ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
