> >>sleep(0) could be defined as: > >>-schedule to next task if there is any (just call schedule() ) > >>-sleep minimum value (1 jiffie) > >> > >>default kernel (no timer patches) uses second definition, > >> > >> > > > >No, linux uses the first definition(or whatever schedule_timeout(0) does). > >If t is zero then expire also becomes zero. > > > > > maybe, my missunderstood > > so, anyone knows what linus.t says about adding one jiffie to every > non-zero expire?
I think this is a bug. It should be enough to round up to nearest jiffie. Ask on the linux kernel list. Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
