On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 10:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > for most of the folks on this list, i suspect they'd be more > interested in patches to a 2.6-style Kconfig file, not a 2.4-style > config.in file, correct?
Yes. The 2.4 kernel is dead. There are two classes of people -- those who are shipping 2.4 already or at least close to doing so, and those who are bringing Linux up on a new board. The former are hopefully already past the stage of being confused by such things in the config files, and the latter should most definitely be using 2.6. -- dwmw2 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/