On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:13:17AM -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, [gb2312] Song Sam wrote: > > But 2.4 kernel is still a pet for 8xx,at least.I guess > > many embedded Linux development lean to 2.4 kernel for > > the moment.For Linux kernel hackers,2.4 kernel was > > dead but it is alive for most embedded > > developers.Right? :-) > > I cannot speak for 'most embedded developers.'; only those with clue.
I find this statement almost offensive, btw. > I would not consider deploying anything new on 2.4 today; it's just > not a viable, maintainable platform in my opinion. I would not consider deploying anything on 2.6 today. IMHO it's not mature enough to be used in production environment. Just my $0.02 Eugene ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
