David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:20AM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote: > [stuff deleted] >> >>In your proposed patch, i'm missing a way to install a board specify >>mapping either by using special constants, callback functions to board >>specific code, .... AFAICS all boards are forced to use the same mapping. > > > That's right. Is there a reason for boards to have different > mappings? I can well believe that there is, but the current tree > doesn't show it - all the boards (in the tree) that have PCI appear to > do the same initialisation of the windows. It doesn't seem worthwhile > to create board specific PCI initialisation hooks until we have a > board that needs it. >
Not all boards using LinuxPPC are in the offical tree (yet). I know at least two boards which are using a "non-standard" PCI mapping. Dave ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
