On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:23:14PM -0700, Andrew May wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:12:33AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > > Fair enough. I'm just trying to come up with the simplest approach > > that still provides the flexibility we need. Based on the evidence > > immediately available, what I posted seemed like it. How about you > > tell me something about the non-standard PCI mappings, so I can come > > up with something better. > > It would be nice to have the option to let the boot loader set the > mapping. I have been happy with getting things done in PPCBoot and > ripping out the PCI scanning in the kernel.
Yes, that's the ideal situation and going to what David and I would like to see makes that yet another simple fallout feature. Your custom port using a good implementation of PPCBoot simply would not call the pci macro init library nor would it use pci_auto. Regards, -- Matt Porter porter at cox.net This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
