On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:26:13PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:18:03PM -0600, VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) wrote: > > Just to mess with your minds... I2C is a trademark of Philips > > Electronics N.V. so that is probably not the best choice from a > > legalistic point of view. > > It's been related to me several times that this is the reason why > most implementers refer to their interface/bus as IIC in > documentation.
Yeah, the most "extreme" variant being "two-wire serial interface", without even mentioning I2C or IIC. You need some familiarity with bus protocol to figure out that this is really I2C :). -- Eugene
