On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:14:28PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:26:13PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:18:03PM -0600, VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) wrote: > > > Just to mess with your minds... I2C is a trademark of Philips > > > Electronics N.V. so that is probably not the best choice from a > > > legalistic point of view. > > > > It's been related to me several times that this is the reason why > > most implementers refer to their interface/bus as IIC in > > documentation. > > Yeah, the most "extreme" variant being "two-wire serial interface", > without even mentioning I2C or IIC.
I see "two-wire serial interface" on a lot of devices. That one is awfully popular. :) > You need some familiarity with bus protocol to figure out that this is > really I2C :). Yup. -Matt
