On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:03:52AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:25:54PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > what does this mean in terms of urgency in getting changes into the > > > 8xx stuff, then? does this imply a fixed window of opportunity in the > > > near future, or does it mean that once stuff starts to get moved > > > upstream, it will get moved on a regular basis? just curious. > > > > Once upstream, new changes won't (unless not-fully-baked) go into > > linuxppc-2.5. > > um ... sorry, i'm still not sure what this means. does it mean that, > at some point (to be determined/announced?), the linuxppc-2.5 tree > will be put to the side, and all further mods should be done directly > against the 2.5 tree?
As has been the goal for a long time, yes. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
