> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > >>On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Is it not time to merge 8xx from linuxppc-2.5 into Linus tree? > >>> > >>>I know the 8xx is not fully functional yet but this isn't done > >>>soon I think it won't happen at all. The 8xx arch can be made to > >>>depend on BROKEN in Linus tree to make it clear that it isn't > >>>working properly yet. > >>> > >>> > >>I've been the hard-ass about holding back on moving 8xx forward. Once > >>2.6.9 finally comes out (assuming and hoping that Linus really intends > >>to do a release and not -rc5), I'll start moving stuff over and make it > >>depend on BROKEN hopefully in time for 2.6.10-rc1. > >> > >>-- > >>Tom Rini > >> > >> > > > >Any progress? > > > > Jocke > >_______________________________________________ > >Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > >Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org > >https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > > > > > > > > > I'm currently battling to make 2.6.10-rc1 work the same way it used do. > > But something changed in slab management and the kmallocs in request_irq > called by init_IRQ fails.
hmm, I think I saw something about that in the www log for Linus kernel. It is offline so I can't check now. The www I/F for both Linus tree(http://linux.bitkeeper.com/) and the ppc tree(http://ppc.bitkeeper.com/) are offline alot. Anyone who knows whats going on? Jocke
