Jon Smirl wrote: > The call to msleep() is inside a block protected with > :#define in_interrupt() (irq_count()) > if (!in_interrupt) > > The stack trace looks like it is in a timer interrupt so shouldn't > irq_count be non-zero? > Could there be some lack of coordination on irq_count and the timer > tick with the preempt patch applied? Or does irq_count() not count > soft irqs? > > (!in_interrupt) may be the wrong way to protect this code.
I think in_atomic() is what you want. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
