Grant Likely wrote: > Scott Wood made an attempt at defining a device binding for I2C > devices, but it has not been merged into booting-without-of.txt yet. > I've copied what he wrote below. I would add to his definition the > following: > - If compatible is missing, driver should *not* fall back to the device name. > - 'compatible' list should include the exact device in the form "<mfg>,<part>"
Those are good recommendations for any node, but I don't see why i2c in particular should mandate it. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
