On 10/23/07, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > > Scott Wood made an attempt at defining a device binding for I2C > > devices, but it has not been merged into booting-without-of.txt yet. > > I've copied what he wrote below. I would add to his definition the > > following: > > - If compatible is missing, driver should *not* fall back to the device > > name. > > - 'compatible' list should include the exact device in the form > > "<mfg>,<part>" > > Those are good recommendations for any node, but I don't see why i2c in > particular should mandate it.
I only mention it because the example given doesn't show that. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
