Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> The fs_enet driver doesn't currently support phy-less >> directly, but you >> may be able to do something with the fixed phy driver. > > How is PHY less support supposed to be impl.? I would like > to do the same for ucc_geth. I once sent a patch that made > the PHY optional, but it never made into the driver.
Basically, the driver needs to assume the link is up if there's no phy-handle in the device tree, rather than error out. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
