No one has answered this yet. It makes no sense at all to mix use of
the vendor prefix on some compatible entries and not on others. The
syntax of compatible entries needs to be consistent.
On 11/7/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > Sometimes the fsl prefix is being used and sometimes it isn't. Look at
> > > the two compatible strings. Which way is it going to be? Is
> > > fsl,has-wdt right?
> >
> > fsl,has-wdt is right, at least since someone changed it.
>
> What's the story with compatible?
> I would think the gdt entries are wrong.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] { // General Purpose Timer
> compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-gpt","fsl,mpc5200-gpt";
>
> code in drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c would need to be changed to.
>
> drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c: { .compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-gpt", },
>
> --
> Jon Smirl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
