On 11/8/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No one has answered this yet. It makes no sense at all to mix use of > the vendor prefix on some compatible entries and not on others. The > syntax of compatible entries needs to be consistent.
The 5200 binding is poorly done on this point. I've got a patch that adds the 'fsl,' prefix so that future 5200 device trees are consistent with the recommended practices (while not breaking older boards of course) g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
