>> On 7/24/07, David H. Lynch Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hopefully this is not too much of a mess.
>> Hooray! Thanks for posting your work. I'm keen to try this on my >> platform. Comments below. >> > [snip] > Any progress on the ll_temac driver since July? In EDK9.2, ll_temac is really the only supported ethernet solution, apart from ethernet lite (yuck). > If there's a PPC version in a reasonable state, i'm happy to see what's requierd to port it across to MicroBlaze. > cheers, > John John, I have a ll_temac for CDMAC version that I made for >2.6.19 that used the old wrapper from a MontaVista 2.4 kernel. It was tested (not overly stressed) and working at speeds > 100Mb. I plan on moving it to a unified source once I had a LocalLink TEMAC that would support my hardware. Xilinx did not support ll_temac w/ RGMII or SGMII which are both found on the ML410 for Gigabit. I currently use David's driver with much success now for the plb_temac. I have a modified version that has been mostly cleaned up. I did remove the ll stuff since it was for a Pico(??) LocalLink TEMAC that I could not find, and not the Xilinx LocalLink TEMAC w/ CDMAC, which is what I was interested in. If interested, I could finish the clean-up on it and post a patch for it (once I figure out how to actually make the patch :P). Right now what mainly remains is finish grouping the functions for FIFO and starting support for DMA. -- Mike _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
