In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I have been suing the eldk4.1 tool chain for a few months now and have
Please post ELDK related questions on the ELDK mailing list instead, see http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/eldk > The problem I have come up against is related to some of the semaphore > functions in semaphore.h, namely sem_wait, sem_post. This was originally > noticed in a third party driver I am porting from one board to another --------------------------^^^^^^^^ > but a small test program has shown the same results. What exactly are you talking about? Device driver (i. e. kernel) code, or application (i. e. user space) code ? > Calls to these functions on the ppc_82xx platform return -1 with an > error code of 38, in this case meaning ENOSYS (not implemented). On the Did you enable the CONFIG_SYSVIPC option in your Linux kernel configuration? > ppc_85xx the same program executes fine, thus I conclude that it is > specific to the libc-2.3.5 for ppc_82xx. Has anyone else come across > this problem, I did find one thread but there was no conclusion listed. There is absolutley no difference between ppc_85xx and ppc_82xx as far as library sources or configuration are concerned. The problem is most probably in your Linux kernel, I guess. > I also can not find anything stating that these functions are not > implemented for the 82xx arch compared with others for the eldk4.1 Provide a test program that fails for yuou, and we can provide much better comments. But please post followups on the ELDK mailing list. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Old programmers never die, they just become managers. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
