On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 07:25:29PM +0000, Daniel Le wrote: > I browsed both the linuxptp devel and user mail archives, but > couldn't see any email thread about RHEL back porting of linuxptp > and ethtool. Perhaps I didn't look at the right places or missed > it. Does someone know where the relevant information is located? I > would much appreciate to learn about the specific issues of back > porting in the past and how they were solved or still remain > unsolved?
See especially http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.linux.ptp.user/512 but also http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.linux.ptp.user/513 > Does 'buggy' refer to the PTP protocol itself or accuracy > achievement or both? Neither. It means that the kernel portions (time stamping and clock control) might not work. Good luck, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
