On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 08:00:51PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:57:36PM -0700, Vedang Patel wrote:
> > @@ -2472,6 +2480,7 @@ static enum fsm_event bc_event(struct port *p, int
> > fd_index)
> > if (p->best)
> > fc_clear(p->best);
> > port_set_announce_tmo(p);
> > + port_clr_tmo(p->fda.fd[FD_SYNC_RX_TIMER]);
> > delay_req_prune(p);
> > if (clock_slave_only(p->clock) && p->delayMechanism != DM_P2P &&
> > port_renew_transport(p)) {
> > @@ -2862,10 +2871,24 @@ struct port *port_open(int phc_index,
>
> This hunk needs some kind of justification, especially since you undo
> it later in the series.
Can you avoid this by putting the inhibit_announce patch first?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
