Hi,

The "cfg.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL)) { " 
  line catch both filter mode is "HWTS_FILTER_FULL, and the fact that the 
filter could is in a higher state for both HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL, 
HWTS_FILTER_CHECK.

Could you be more specific what does the HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME means?

For me, the HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME might be good when using filter mode 
"HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL".

But when filter mode is "HWTS_FILTER_FULL" I would accept that the flag will be 
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL only.

What would you accept on filter mode HWTS_FILTER_CHECK?


Full state machine:

HWTS_FILTER_CHECK
    get config
    check if RX filter one of Rx filter 1, Rx filter 2, HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL
    As HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL is a higher state

HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL
    set Rx filter 1
    if fail set Rx filter 2
    check if RX filter one of Rx filter 1, Rx filter 2, HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL
    As HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL is a higher state

HWTS_FILTER_FULL
    set Rx filter HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL
    check if RX filter one of Rx filter 1, Rx filter 2, HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL
    Filter should be HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL, 
     but if NIc driver only set filter to be one of Rx filter 1, Rx filter 2 
then the PTP daemon may proceed normally.

Erez

________________________________________
From: Petr Machata [pe...@mellanox.com]
Sent: 10 June 2019 15:56
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2] sk: Recognize HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME

struct hwtstamp_config.rx_filter passed to SIOCSHWTSTAMP can be updated by
the kernel with the value of HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME. That indicates that all
requested packets will be timestamped, and some others as well.

Update hwts_init() to recognize this as a valid response, instead of
rejecting it as mismatch.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <pe...@mellanox.com>
---

Notes:
    v2: Fix whitespace.

 sk.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sk.c b/sk.c
index 93ba77a..416d784 100644
--- a/sk.c
+++ b/sk.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static int hwts_init(int fd, const char *device, int 
rx_filter,
        if (cfg.tx_type != tx_type ||
            (cfg.rx_filter != rx_filter &&
             cfg.rx_filter != rx_filter2 &&
-            cfg.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL)) {
+            cfg.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL &&
+            cfg.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME)) {
                pr_debug("tx_type   %d not %d", cfg.tx_type, tx_type);
                pr_debug("rx_filter %d not %d or %d", cfg.rx_filter, rx_filter,
                         rx_filter2);
--
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to