On 7/25/2020 7:34 PM, Matthew P. Grosvenor wrote: > >> The messages are standardized and use TLV format so writing your own >> send/receive bits would not be too difficult. Plus, if you don't mind >> GPL you can just simply fork and port pmc into whatever language you >> prefer. > > This is exactly what I’m trying to avoid: committing the cardinal sin of > open source. If the project doesn’t do exactly what you need, just write > yet-another similar but different implementation written in yet-another > language, rather than maintain and extend the existing one. >
It's good to ask. However, this project doesn't wish to maintain something more complex than the tiny PMC tool already provided, as pointed out in another reply in this thread. This is also the beauty of open source: you can build on top of this work and maintain what you need, even if the original authors do not wish to do so. Thanks, Jake _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
