On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:06AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > It seems you are set on this terminology. I think it would work for > me, although in my head I mostly see the packets on the network > instead of a time signal. Have you considered adopting a server/client > terminology like NTP is using? I know some people that use it with PTP > and maybe it would be easier for a wider adoption.
I considered that, but ... How would you feel about client/server terminology in the context of phc2sys? For example, you would have to call eth0 the "server" and CLOCK_REALTIME the "client". Thoughts? Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
