On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > That wouldn't work well, but as phc2sys doesn't use PTP to synchronize > the clocks, I think it can use a different terminology than ptp4l. It > might actually be less confusing. In the current code the same clock > is master and slave at the same time in different contexts.
So how about using client/server in the context of the PTP and source/sink in phc2sys and ts2phc? Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
