On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:19:29AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Now that the pmc_agent is going to have a more 'stable' interface, I > wonder if this callback is even properly placed in struct pmc_agent and > shouldn't be a simple argument passed to run_pmc_events(), considering > that this is the only place where it's called from. It would also > simplify the implementation, with those "excluded" managementId's.
Yes, that "excluded" thing smelled bad -- I didn't grok it -- but it needs to change -- thanks for the idea! > > +/** > > + * Creates an instance of a PMC agent. > > + * @return Pointer to a PMC instance on sauces, NULL otherwise. > > Sauces? Yes sir, tonight the chef recommends either the Bordelaise or the Sauce au Poivre. _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
