On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:49:38PM -0500, Hussamuddin Nasir via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > The logs suggested that the delay path was off by +/- 4ns which was > acceptable for us. > > Richard: Does this sound like a workable solution.. ?
Yes, your use case is the reason why ptp_kvm was created in the first place. I haven't used it myself, but it sounds like you are using it to good effect! Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
