On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:24:59AM +0000, Geva, Erez wrote: > Hi, > > When we would use multiple PHC per interface (or per bridge/switch). > How can we defer a real PHC from virtual PHC?
I think you would need to iterate over all interfaces and find the one which has the vclock, and then get the index of its real PHC. > Would not it be easier to simply call then multiple PHC and use the index > regardless if it is virtual or not. I'm not sure to what exactly you are referring to, but in the patches I sent we need to know whether it's a virtual clock in order to bind the sockets. > As for the PORT_PROPERTIES_NP. It is a port TLV not a clock TLV. With the jbod option each port can have a different PHC. > I think it is better to add a new TLV and not break backward compatible of > PORT_PROPERTIES_NP. > A patch like that was rejected 2 month ago. Ok. Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
