>On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:23:25PM +0000, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote: >> Richard, >> I know our solution in its current state is far from being perfect. >> It communicates with EEC by shell commands specified by the user, but at >> least >> it is not specific for any particular hardware. >> Although it doesn't configure EEC, as it shall be preconfigured before using >> our >> solution. > >I'm not able to judge between the two new projects based on technical >merits, because I simply have no time to do so. > >WRT integration into linuxptp, seeing as there is no agreement on a >path forward, I am not going to merge any major new SyncE services >into linuxptp. > >May I suggest that both SyncE projects publish their code on >GH/whatever and build their communities. Competition is a good thing >in the OSS world! > >For the interaction between SyncE services and ptp4l, let's discuss >proposals for new management messages here in this channel. I'm sure >we can come with message formats that will work for any SyncE use >case. > >Thanks, >Richard >
Thank you very much Richard! BR, Arkadiusz _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
