On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 11:28, Luigi Mantellini <luigi.mantell...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The actual ptp4l implementation rearms timers on timeut. This doesn't
> permit to have a precise TX SYNC
Did you misspell "timeout"?
> message scheduling.
> The following patchset uses non blocking timers and only for TX SYNC timer
> a periodic timer is used.
> In addition, a periodic timer requires to read (and flush) the file
> descriptor and a new timerfd_flush() function has been introduced for this.
>
>
Cool :-)
This explanation is coherent.
We usually add a cover letter, using 'git format-patch' with the
'--cover-letter' options.
And please add a short explanation on the issue you solve to each patch
(relevant to each patch).
And if the solution is not trivial, a short explanation on the solution as
well.
Thanks
Erez
> e2e_tc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> fd.h | 4 ++--
> p2p_tc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> port.c | 102
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> port.h | 10 ++++++++++
> raw.c | 4 ++--
> udp.c | 4 ++--
> udp6.c | 4 ++--
> 8 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> [PATCH 1/6] Use constant FD_EVENT and FD_GENERAL instead numeric
> [PATCH 2/6] Rearrange the fdarray in order to serve timers before
> [PATCH 3/6] Flush timer fd after expiration
> [PATCH 4/6] Split announce/sync_rx timer rearm on expiration fd
> [PATCH 5/6] Use Non-blocking timer file descriptors
> [PATCH 6/6] Use periodic timer for TX SYNC timeout
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxptp-devel mailing list
> Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
