On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 12:30:38PM +0200, Stephan Wurm wrote: > diff --git a/fsm.h b/fsm.h > index 857af05..919e934 100644 > --- a/fsm.h > +++ b/fsm.h > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum port_state { > PS_PASSIVE, > PS_UNCALIBRATED, > PS_SLAVE, > + PS_PASSIVE_SLAVE, /*according to IEC 62439-3 doubly attached clocks*/
NAK. There is no such state in IEEE 1588. > PS_GRAND_MASTER, /*non-standard extension*/ > }; > > @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ enum fsm_event { > EV_RS_GRAND_MASTER, > EV_RS_SLAVE, > EV_RS_PASSIVE, > + EV_RS_PSLAVE, /*according to IEC 62439-3 doubly attached clocks*/ There is no such recommended state event. If you "profile" invents a new BMCA, then you should implement it explictily. We have ptp_fsm() and ptp_slave_fsm(), and you really should add ptp_iec_whatevet_fsm() rather than hacking in specialy cases to the 1588 state machines. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel