On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:17:35AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > Looking at ptp4l, sending an incorrect currentUtcOffset with > currentUtcOffsetValid=0 is technically not wrong, but I agree that we > should retain the correct offset when provided by a GM, even after > that GM disappears.
Over on the linuxptp-devel list, I posted a series that should fix this issue. Please see if it fixes the problem for you. In order to test it, you can force the TAI-UTC offset to an out of date value (like 35) using the configuration file or the command line. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
