On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:27:37PM +0100, Hannes Harms wrote: > For example currently it is not possible to sync a gstreamer ptp clock with > a ptp4l master on the same host.
The gstreamer PTP implementation is completely broken. It has no business receiving PTP packets! It should really use the standard interfaces that we have provided. > Is it safe to enable IP_MULTICAST_LOOP ? At the very least, this will cause ptp4l to receive its own transmission. > Would a patch to enable IP_MULTICAST_LOOP be acceptable? Let's not hack ptp4l. Instead, how about adding proper PTP support into gstreamer? Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
