On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:10:49PM +0000, Kirchhoff, Philip wrote: > we have a problem with linuxptp 2.0 when using 254 as domain number (which > should be OK according to IEEE C37.238-2017). As you can see in the > timemaster log file the ptp4l process terminates:
IEEE 1588 specifies that domain numbers 128-255 are "reserved". There is no provision for using them in that standard. If published profiles are using these reserved values, then it is a simple matter to support them. > Does ptp4l support IEEE C37.238-2017 at all? Obviously not. Patches are welcome... Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
