So how in the would could *more* traffic cause a *smaller* delay? Very curious.
Wild Guess, maybe interrupt coalescing is going on, and with more packets, it's actually responding sooner? Another guess, that somehow the determination of the timestamps are just plain wrong. Like maybe they were fudged to some value while under heavy load, and are way more off when under light load? Just guesses as I said. I don't do 1588 much anymore, but this is very intriguing. Please report back if you ever get to the bottom of this. -Dale _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
